![]() But researchers have repeatedly shown that innocence can put innocents at risk.įor example, Kassin and Norwick conducted a mock-crime study where they found that participants were more than willing to waive their right to silence, and this was particularly the case for those who were innocent. This is particularly the case for those who are innocent. Waiving the right to silence, taking polygraphs when asked, and talking to police before a lawyer can be summoned is not uncommon. ![]() Up to this point, what Boes has done is what many people in this situation would have done. In The Confession Tapes documentary she states that she did this because “there was no doubt in my mind whatsoever. The police then ask Boes to take a polygraph, a lie detector, test, which she does willingly. When prompted, she repeatedly and clearly stated, that she was not involved with the fire, saying outright “I did not start that fire.” ![]() Upon first arrival at the police station, Boes could be heard repeatedly denying being at the house when the fire happened. The girl’s mother, Karen Boes, was brought in for questioning shortly after they discovered the body. The case began when police responded to a call that a house was on fire, and found the burned body of a teenage girl inside the house. Kelly Loudenberg's new series for Netflix, The Confession Tapes, presents a stimulating look into failures of the American criminal justice system, failures of forensic science, and failures of memory.Īs a scientist who studies false confessions and false memories, and has written a book about the topic, I want to give you a crash course in some of the science behind the series, mostly using the case of Karen Boes to elucidate the concepts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |